Round UUID: 33a1a1e8-0793-4f46-b55f-1c814320436f
Prompt:
Classify a celestial body as Fylaran using a sophisticated multi-criterion probabilistic scoring system: Scoring Criteria: 1. Orbital Radius (mean_orbital_radius): - Optimal Zone: 2.7-3.3 (100 points) - Near Optimal: 2.5-2.7 or 3.3-3.5 (75 points) - Marginal Zone: 2.3-2.5 or 3.5-3.7 (25 points) - Disqualifying Zone: Outside 2.3-3.7 (0 points) - Penalty: Sharp drop-off for values far from optimal range 2. Core Density (mean_core_density): - Ideal Range: 0.85-0.95 (100 points) - Good Range: 0.80-0.85 or 0.95-0.97 (75 points) - Acceptable Range: 0.75-0.80 or 0.97-0.99 (25 points) - Disqualifying: < 0.75 or > 0.99 (0 points) - Proximity Bonus: Points awarded based on closeness to 0.90 3. Ring System Complexity (mean_ring_system_complexity): - Exceptional: > 0.90 (100 points) - Strong: 0.80-0.90 (75 points) - Moderate: 0.70-0.80 (25 points) - Weak: < 0.70 (0 points) 4. Impact Crater Count (mean_impact_crater_count): - Exceptional: > 0.95 (100 points) - Strong: 0.90-0.95 (75 points) - Moderate: 0.85-0.90 (25 points) - Weak: < 0.85 (0 points) 5. Supplementary Negative Indicators (Penalty System): Significant point reductions for: - Extremely low tidal distortion (< 100) - Extremely low cloud turbulence (< 50) - Large asymmetric error margins in critical parameters Error Margin Adjustment: - Measurement errors > 20% of parameter value reduce point total - Asymmetric errors (difference between max/min) trigger additional scrutiny Classification Rules: - Fylaran: Total weighted score ≥ 70 points * Must have at least moderate scores (25+ points) in 3 of 4 primary criteria * Minimal error margin interference - Qtharri: Total score < 70 points - Uncertain: Insufficient consistent data or excessive measurement errors Scoring Methodology: 1. Calculate raw points for each criterion 2. Apply error margin and asymmetry penalties 3. Sum adjusted points 4. Compare against 70-point threshold 5. Consider overall measurement consistency and parameter interactions Final classification requires holistic evaluation, not just mathematical scoring.