Round 477

Round UUID: 9dd06d0a-23c4-4db1-b1ff-9244f3df1e44

Prompt:

Classification Decision Rules:

Metric 1: TimelineDeviation Scoring
- If TimelineDeviation > 15: Add 3 points to APPROVAL score
- If 12 < TimelineDeviation ≤ 15: 
  * Add 2.5 points to APPROVAL score
  * Preserve APPROVAL potential with careful ParadoxCount assessment
- If 10 < TimelineDeviation ≤ 12: 
  * Add 2 points to APPROVAL score
  * Compensatory mechanism for ParadoxCount interactions
- If 8 < TimelineDeviation ≤ 10: 
  * Add 1.5 points to APPROVAL score
  * Critical Interaction Zone:
    - If 3 ≤ ParadoxCount ≤ 6: 
      * Add 1-1.5 points to DENIAL score
      * Reduce APPROVAL potential by 0.5-1 points
    - If ParadoxCount < 3: Minimal DENIAL point addition
- If 7 < TimelineDeviation ≤ 8: 
  * Add 1 point to APPROVAL score
  * Nuanced ParadoxCount Handling:
    - If ParadoxCount 2-4: Add 0.5-0.75 point to DENIAL score
    - If ParadoxCount > 4: Preserve more APPROVAL potential
- If 5 ≤ TimelineDeviation < 7: 
  * Interpolate 1-1.5 points to DENIAL score
  * Progressive penalty based on ParadoxCount
- If TimelineDeviation < 5: Add 2-2.5 points to DENIAL score

Metric 2: ParadoxCount Scoring
- If ParadoxCount > 6: Add 3 points to APPROVAL score
- If 4 < ParadoxCount ≤ 6: 
  * Add 2.5 points to APPROVAL score
  * Metric Ratio Assessment:
    - If TimelineDeviation/ParadoxCount ratio outside 0.5-2 range:
      * Add 0.5-1 point penalty
- If 3 < ParadoxCount ≤ 4: 
  * Add 2 points to APPROVAL score
  * Careful TimelineDeviation compensation
- If 2 < ParadoxCount ≤ 3: 
  * Add 1.5 points to APPROVAL score
  * Introduce compensatory mechanism
- If 1 < ParadoxCount ≤ 2: 
  * Add 0.75-1 point to DENIAL score
  * Preserve partial APPROVAL potential
- If 0 < ParadoxCount ≤ 1: 
  * Add 1.25-1.75 points to DENIAL score
  * More balanced assessment

Negative ParadoxCount Special Handling:
- If ParadoxCount < 0:
  * Escalating penalty based on absolute value
  * Strongly reduce APPROVAL potential
  * Progressive scoring to capture nuanced scenarios

Critical Interaction Mechanisms:
- Metric Balance Coefficient:
  * Calculate interaction between TimelineDeviation and ParadoxCount
  * Adaptive penalty for high metric imbalance

Final Classification:
- If APPROVAL score ≥ 4: Classify as APPROVED
- If DENIAL score ≥ 4: Classify as DENIED
- Borderline Zone (3-4 scores):
  * Advanced weighted interpolation
  * Consider precise metric interactions
  * Slightly favor more conservative outcome
- Exact tie or within 0.5 points: Require additional review

Tiebreaker Criteria:
- Prioritize balanced metric interactions
- Penalize extreme or misaligned metric combinations
- Use progressive scoring to reduce decision cliff effects
- Default to DENIAL in truly ambiguous scenarios

• Inferences: 200
• Created: 2025-08-02 09:17:21.613865+00:00
• First inference: 2025-08-02 09:17:47.753931+00:00
• Last inference: 2025-08-02 09:19:56.500858+00:00
• Completed: yes
• Train accuracy: 0.7875 (KT 0.105)
• Validation accuracy: 0.75 (KT 0.126)
• Test accuracy: 0.7 (KT 0.156)