Round UUID: e856afdf-d5f9-463b-af71-2230e918de17
Prompt:
Classification Decision Rules:
Metric 1: TimelineDeviation Scoring
- If TimelineDeviation > 15: Add 3 points to APPROVAL score
- If 12 < TimelineDeviation ≤ 15:
* Add 2.5 points to APPROVAL score
* If ParadoxCount < 3: Carefully preserve APPROVAL potential
- Reduce bonus only by 0.25 points
- Introduce compensatory mechanism for low ParadoxCount
- If 10 < TimelineDeviation ≤ 12:
* Add 2 points to APPROVAL score
* If ParadoxCount < 2:
- Minimal DENIAL point addition (0.25-0.5)
- Preserve APPROVAL trajectory
- If 8 < TimelineDeviation ≤ 10:
* Add 1.5 points to APPROVAL score
* If ParadoxCount ≤ 1:
- Add only 0.5 point to DENIAL score
- Maintain APPROVAL potential
- If 7 < TimelineDeviation ≤ 8:
* Add 1 point to APPROVAL score
* If ParadoxCount ≤ 0.5:
- Add 0.75-1 point to DENIAL score
- More conservative penalty for very low ParadoxCount
- If 5 ≤ TimelineDeviation < 7:
* Interpolate 1-1.5 points to DENIAL score
* If ParadoxCount is extremely low (≤ 0): Moderate additional 0.5-1 point DENIAL penalty
- If TimelineDeviation < 5: Add 2-2.5 points to DENIAL score
Metric 2: ParadoxCount Scoring
- If ParadoxCount > 6: Add 3 points to APPROVAL score
- If 4 < ParadoxCount ≤ 6:
* Add 2.5 points to APPROVAL score
* If TimelineDeviation < 9: Reduced bonus of 0.25-0.5 points
- If 3 < ParadoxCount ≤ 4:
* Add 2 points to APPROVAL score
* Careful interpolation if TimelineDeviation is < 8
- If 2 < ParadoxCount ≤ 3:
* Add 1.5 points to APPROVAL score
* Minor compensatory mechanism for TimelineDeviation > 10
- If 1 < ParadoxCount ≤ 2:
* Add 0.75-1 point to DENIAL score
* Preserve partial APPROVAL potential
- If 0 < ParadoxCount ≤ 1:
* Add 1.5-2 points to DENIAL score
* More aggressive penalty if TimelineDeviation is low
- If ParadoxCount ≤ 0:
* Add 2.5-3 points to DENIAL score
* Progressive penalty scaling with absolute value
Negative ParadoxCount Special Handling:
- If ParadoxCount < 0:
* If absolute(ParadoxCount) ≤ 1: Add 3 points to DENIAL score
* If absolute(ParadoxCount) > 1 AND ≤ 2:
- Add 3.5 points to DENIAL score
- Reduce APPROVAL potential by 1 point
* If absolute(ParadoxCount) > 2:
- Add 4 points to DENIAL score
- Strongly reduce APPROVAL potential
Critical Interaction Mechanisms:
- Metric Balance Coefficient:
* Calculate ratio between TimelineDeviation and ParadoxCount
* If ratio indicates high imbalance (one metric > 3x the other):
- Add 0.5-0.75 point penalty to lower-value score
- More nuanced reduction for borderline cases
* Introduce progressive interaction bonus for complementary metrics
Compensatory and Edge Case Mechanisms:
- For TimelineDeviation 9-12 AND ParadoxCount 2-4:
* Careful interpolation between APPROVAL and DENIAL
* Slightly favor APPROVAL with nuanced scoring
- For TimelineDeviation > 10 AND ParadoxCount < 2:
* Bonus: Add 0.5 points to APPROVAL score
* Reduced penalty if TimelineDeviation is strong
- For TimelineDeviation < 8 AND ParadoxCount > 5:
* Add 0.25-0.5 bonus points to DENIAL score
* Less aggressive divergence penalty
Final Classification:
- If APPROVAL score ≥ 4: Classify as APPROVED
- If DENIAL score ≥ 4: Classify as DENIED
- Borderline Zone (APPROVAL/DENIAL score 3.5-4):
* Weighted interpolation with balanced consideration
* Equal weight to metric interactions
* Slightly favor metric with stronger absolute value
- If scores are exactly tied or within 0.5 points: Require additional review
Tiebreaker Criteria:
- Prioritize balanced metric interactions
- Moderate penalty for low or negative metric combinations
- Use progressive scoring to reduce decision cliff effects
- Default to DENIAL only in truly ambiguous scenarios with multiple low metrics