Round UUID: eb4bd33b-525e-4e6c-bee8-34531d9fc2de
Prompt:
Classification Decision Rules: Metric 1: TimelineDeviation Scoring - If TimelineDeviation > 15: Add 3 points to APPROVAL score - If 12 < TimelineDeviation ≤ 15: * Add 2.5 points to APPROVAL score * If ParadoxCount < 3: Reduce bonus by only 0.25 points (less aggressive) - If 10 < TimelineDeviation ≤ 12: * Add 2 points to APPROVAL score * If ParadoxCount < 4: Apply gentle 0.25-0.5 point interpolation - If 8 < TimelineDeviation ≤ 10: * Add 1.5 points to APPROVAL score * If ParadoxCount ≤ 2: - Add only 0.25-0.5 point to DENIAL score (reduced penalty) - Moderate APPROVAL potential reduction - If 7 < TimelineDeviation ≤ 8: * Add 1 point to APPROVAL score * If ParadoxCount ≤ 1: Add 0.75-1 point to DENIAL score (less aggressive) - If 5 ≤ TimelineDeviation < 7: * Interpolate 0.75-1.5 points to DENIAL score * If ParadoxCount is very low (≤ 0): Add additional 1 point to DENIAL score - If TimelineDeviation < 5: Add 2-3 points to DENIAL score Metric 2: ParadoxCount Scoring - If ParadoxCount > 6: Add 3 points to APPROVAL score - If 4 < ParadoxCount ≤ 6: * Add 2.5 points to APPROVAL score * If TimelineDeviation < 10: Reduce bonus by only 0.25-0.5 point - If 3 < ParadoxCount ≤ 4: * Add 2 points to APPROVAL score * Gentle interpolation if TimelineDeviation is low - If 2 < ParadoxCount ≤ 3: * Add 1.5 points to APPROVAL score * Introduce a small (0.25 point) compensatory mechanism if TimelineDeviation is > 10 - If 1 < ParadoxCount ≤ 2: * Add 0.75 point to DENIAL score * Preserve some APPROVAL potential - If 0 < ParadoxCount ≤ 1: * Add 1-1.5 points to DENIAL score * Less aggressive penalty if TimelineDeviation is > 8 - If ParadoxCount ≤ 0: * Add 2-3 points to DENIAL score * Progressive penalty scaling with absolute value Negative ParadoxCount Special Handling: - If ParadoxCount < 0: * If absolute(ParadoxCount) ≤ 1: Add 2.5-3 points to DENIAL score * If absolute(ParadoxCount) > 1 AND ≤ 2: - Add 3.5 points to DENIAL score - Reduce APPROVAL potential by 1 point (less severe) * If absolute(ParadoxCount) > 2: - Add 4 points to DENIAL score - Strongly reduce APPROVAL potential Critical Interaction Mechanisms: - Metric Balance Coefficient: * Calculate ratio between TimelineDeviation and ParadoxCount * If ratio indicates high imbalance (one metric > 3x the other): - Add 0.5-0.75 point penalty to lower-value score - More nuanced reduction for borderline cases * Introduce progressive interaction bonus for complementary metrics Compensatory and Edge Case Mechanisms: - For TimelineDeviation 9-12 AND ParadoxCount 3-5: * Careful interpolation between APPROVAL and DENIAL * Slightly favor APPROVAL with nuanced scoring - For TimelineDeviation > 10 AND ParadoxCount < 3: * Bonus: Add 0.5 points to APPROVAL score * Reduced penalty if TimelineDeviation is strong - For TimelineDeviation < 7 AND ParadoxCount > 5: * Add 0.25-0.5 bonus points to DENIAL score * Less aggressive divergence penalty Final Classification: - If APPROVAL score ≥ 4: Classify as APPROVED - If DENIAL score ≥ 4: Classify as DENIED - Borderline Zone (APPROVAL/DENIAL score 3.5-4): * Weighted interpolation with balanced consideration * Equal weight to metric interactions * Slightly favor metric with stronger absolute value - If scores are exactly tied or within 0.5 points: Require additional review Tiebreaker Criteria: - Prioritize balanced metric interactions - Moderate penalty for low or negative metric combinations - Use progressive scoring to reduce decision cliff effects - Default to DENIAL only in truly ambiguous scenarios with multiple low metrics