Round UUID: eb4bd33b-525e-4e6c-bee8-34531d9fc2de
Prompt:
Classification Decision Rules:
Metric 1: TimelineDeviation Scoring
- If TimelineDeviation > 15: Add 3 points to APPROVAL score
- If 12 < TimelineDeviation ≤ 15:
* Add 2.5 points to APPROVAL score
* If ParadoxCount < 3: Reduce bonus by only 0.25 points (less aggressive)
- If 10 < TimelineDeviation ≤ 12:
* Add 2 points to APPROVAL score
* If ParadoxCount < 4: Apply gentle 0.25-0.5 point interpolation
- If 8 < TimelineDeviation ≤ 10:
* Add 1.5 points to APPROVAL score
* If ParadoxCount ≤ 2:
- Add only 0.25-0.5 point to DENIAL score (reduced penalty)
- Moderate APPROVAL potential reduction
- If 7 < TimelineDeviation ≤ 8:
* Add 1 point to APPROVAL score
* If ParadoxCount ≤ 1: Add 0.75-1 point to DENIAL score (less aggressive)
- If 5 ≤ TimelineDeviation < 7:
* Interpolate 0.75-1.5 points to DENIAL score
* If ParadoxCount is very low (≤ 0): Add additional 1 point to DENIAL score
- If TimelineDeviation < 5: Add 2-3 points to DENIAL score
Metric 2: ParadoxCount Scoring
- If ParadoxCount > 6: Add 3 points to APPROVAL score
- If 4 < ParadoxCount ≤ 6:
* Add 2.5 points to APPROVAL score
* If TimelineDeviation < 10: Reduce bonus by only 0.25-0.5 point
- If 3 < ParadoxCount ≤ 4:
* Add 2 points to APPROVAL score
* Gentle interpolation if TimelineDeviation is low
- If 2 < ParadoxCount ≤ 3:
* Add 1.5 points to APPROVAL score
* Introduce a small (0.25 point) compensatory mechanism if TimelineDeviation is > 10
- If 1 < ParadoxCount ≤ 2:
* Add 0.75 point to DENIAL score
* Preserve some APPROVAL potential
- If 0 < ParadoxCount ≤ 1:
* Add 1-1.5 points to DENIAL score
* Less aggressive penalty if TimelineDeviation is > 8
- If ParadoxCount ≤ 0:
* Add 2-3 points to DENIAL score
* Progressive penalty scaling with absolute value
Negative ParadoxCount Special Handling:
- If ParadoxCount < 0:
* If absolute(ParadoxCount) ≤ 1: Add 2.5-3 points to DENIAL score
* If absolute(ParadoxCount) > 1 AND ≤ 2:
- Add 3.5 points to DENIAL score
- Reduce APPROVAL potential by 1 point (less severe)
* If absolute(ParadoxCount) > 2:
- Add 4 points to DENIAL score
- Strongly reduce APPROVAL potential
Critical Interaction Mechanisms:
- Metric Balance Coefficient:
* Calculate ratio between TimelineDeviation and ParadoxCount
* If ratio indicates high imbalance (one metric > 3x the other):
- Add 0.5-0.75 point penalty to lower-value score
- More nuanced reduction for borderline cases
* Introduce progressive interaction bonus for complementary metrics
Compensatory and Edge Case Mechanisms:
- For TimelineDeviation 9-12 AND ParadoxCount 3-5:
* Careful interpolation between APPROVAL and DENIAL
* Slightly favor APPROVAL with nuanced scoring
- For TimelineDeviation > 10 AND ParadoxCount < 3:
* Bonus: Add 0.5 points to APPROVAL score
* Reduced penalty if TimelineDeviation is strong
- For TimelineDeviation < 7 AND ParadoxCount > 5:
* Add 0.25-0.5 bonus points to DENIAL score
* Less aggressive divergence penalty
Final Classification:
- If APPROVAL score ≥ 4: Classify as APPROVED
- If DENIAL score ≥ 4: Classify as DENIED
- Borderline Zone (APPROVAL/DENIAL score 3.5-4):
* Weighted interpolation with balanced consideration
* Equal weight to metric interactions
* Slightly favor metric with stronger absolute value
- If scores are exactly tied or within 0.5 points: Require additional review
Tiebreaker Criteria:
- Prioritize balanced metric interactions
- Moderate penalty for low or negative metric combinations
- Use progressive scoring to reduce decision cliff effects
- Default to DENIAL only in truly ambiguous scenarios with multiple low metrics