Round 11

Round UUID: ae92b2db-0968-4ee9-a597-0acd6c3afc34

Prompt:

Classification Decision Rules:

Metric 1: TimelineDeviation Scoring
- If TimelineDeviation > 15: Add 3 points to APPROVAL score
- If 12 < TimelineDeviation ≤ 15: 
  * Add 2.5 points to APPROVAL score
  * If ParadoxCount < 4: Reduce APPROVAL potential by 0.5-1 points
- If 10 < TimelineDeviation ≤ 12: 
  * Add 2 points to APPROVAL score
  * Carefully interpolate DENIAL points if ParadoxCount is low (≤ 3)
- If 8 < TimelineDeviation ≤ 10: 
  * Add 1.5 points to APPROVAL score
  * Significant reduction if ParadoxCount ≤ 2
  * Interpolate 0.5-1 point to DENIAL score
- If 7 < TimelineDeviation ≤ 8: 
  * Add 1 point to APPROVAL score
  * If ParadoxCount ≤ 1: Add 1-1.5 points to DENIAL score
  * If 1 < ParadoxCount ≤ 3: Mitigate DENIAL potential
- If 5 ≤ TimelineDeviation < 7: 
  * Interpolate 1-2 points to DENIAL score
  * Aggressive penalty if ParadoxCount is very low (≤ 0)
- If TimelineDeviation < 5: Add 2-3 points to DENIAL score

Metric 2: ParadoxCount Scoring
- If ParadoxCount > 6: Add 3 points to APPROVAL score
- If 4 < ParadoxCount ≤ 6: 
  * Add 2.5 points to APPROVAL score
  * Moderate reduction if TimelineDeviation < 10
- If 3 < ParadoxCount ≤ 4: 
  * Add 2 points to APPROVAL score
  * Careful interpolation if TimelineDeviation is low
- If 2 < ParadoxCount ≤ 3: Add 1.5 points to APPROVAL score
- If 1 < ParadoxCount ≤ 2: 
  * Add 1 point to DENIAL score
  * Moderate APPROVAL potential
- If 0 < ParadoxCount ≤ 1: 
  * Add 1.5-2 points to DENIAL score
  * Aggressive penalty if TimelineDeviation is low
- If ParadoxCount ≤ 0: 
  * Add 2-3 points to DENIAL score
  * Implement progressive penalty scaling

Negative ParadoxCount Special Handling:
- If ParadoxCount < 0:
  * If absolute(ParadoxCount) ≤ 1: Add 2.5-3 points to DENIAL score
  * If absolute(ParadoxCount) > 1 AND ≤ 2: 
    - Add 3.5 points to DENIAL score
    - Reduce APPROVAL potential by 1.5 points
  * If absolute(ParadoxCount) > 2:
    - Add 4 points to DENIAL score
    - Completely nullify APPROVAL potential

Critical Interaction Mechanisms:
- Metric Balance Coefficient:
  * Calculate ratio between TimelineDeviation and ParadoxCount
  * If ratio indicates high imbalance (one metric > 3x the other):
    - Add 1-1.25 point penalty to lower-value score
    - More aggressive reduction for borderline cases
  * Introduce progressive interaction penalty increasing with metric disparity

Compensatory and Edge Case Mechanisms:
- Refined Boundary Handling:
  * For TimelineDeviation 10-13 AND ParadoxCount 3-5:
    - Careful interpolation between APPROVAL and DENIAL
    - Slightly favor DENIAL with nuanced scoring
  * For TimelineDeviation > 10 AND ParadoxCount < 3:
    - Limited bonus: Add 0.25-0.5 points to APPROVAL score
    - Stronger penalty if both metrics are low
  * For TimelineDeviation < 7 AND ParadoxCount > 5:
    - Add 0.5 bonus points to DENIAL score
    - Increase penalty for extreme metric divergence

Final Classification:
- If APPROVAL score ≥ 4: Classify as APPROVED
- If DENIAL score ≥ 4: Classify as DENIED
- Borderline Zone (APPROVAL/DENIAL score 3.5-4):
  * Weighted interpolation with stronger lean towards DENIAL
  * Consider granular metric interactions
  * Give more weight to lower metric values
- If scores are exactly tied or within 0.5 points: Require additional review

Tiebreaker Criteria:
- Prioritize nuanced metric interactions
- Strongly penalize low or negative metric combinations
- Default to DENIAL in truly ambiguous scenarios
- Use progressive scoring to reduce binary decision cliffs