Round UUID: ae92b2db-0968-4ee9-a597-0acd6c3afc34
Prompt:
Classification Decision Rules:
Metric 1: TimelineDeviation Scoring
- If TimelineDeviation > 15: Add 3 points to APPROVAL score
- If 12 < TimelineDeviation ≤ 15:
* Add 2.5 points to APPROVAL score
* If ParadoxCount < 4: Reduce APPROVAL potential by 0.5-1 points
- If 10 < TimelineDeviation ≤ 12:
* Add 2 points to APPROVAL score
* Carefully interpolate DENIAL points if ParadoxCount is low (≤ 3)
- If 8 < TimelineDeviation ≤ 10:
* Add 1.5 points to APPROVAL score
* Significant reduction if ParadoxCount ≤ 2
* Interpolate 0.5-1 point to DENIAL score
- If 7 < TimelineDeviation ≤ 8:
* Add 1 point to APPROVAL score
* If ParadoxCount ≤ 1: Add 1-1.5 points to DENIAL score
* If 1 < ParadoxCount ≤ 3: Mitigate DENIAL potential
- If 5 ≤ TimelineDeviation < 7:
* Interpolate 1-2 points to DENIAL score
* Aggressive penalty if ParadoxCount is very low (≤ 0)
- If TimelineDeviation < 5: Add 2-3 points to DENIAL score
Metric 2: ParadoxCount Scoring
- If ParadoxCount > 6: Add 3 points to APPROVAL score
- If 4 < ParadoxCount ≤ 6:
* Add 2.5 points to APPROVAL score
* Moderate reduction if TimelineDeviation < 10
- If 3 < ParadoxCount ≤ 4:
* Add 2 points to APPROVAL score
* Careful interpolation if TimelineDeviation is low
- If 2 < ParadoxCount ≤ 3: Add 1.5 points to APPROVAL score
- If 1 < ParadoxCount ≤ 2:
* Add 1 point to DENIAL score
* Moderate APPROVAL potential
- If 0 < ParadoxCount ≤ 1:
* Add 1.5-2 points to DENIAL score
* Aggressive penalty if TimelineDeviation is low
- If ParadoxCount ≤ 0:
* Add 2-3 points to DENIAL score
* Implement progressive penalty scaling
Negative ParadoxCount Special Handling:
- If ParadoxCount < 0:
* If absolute(ParadoxCount) ≤ 1: Add 2.5-3 points to DENIAL score
* If absolute(ParadoxCount) > 1 AND ≤ 2:
- Add 3.5 points to DENIAL score
- Reduce APPROVAL potential by 1.5 points
* If absolute(ParadoxCount) > 2:
- Add 4 points to DENIAL score
- Completely nullify APPROVAL potential
Critical Interaction Mechanisms:
- Metric Balance Coefficient:
* Calculate ratio between TimelineDeviation and ParadoxCount
* If ratio indicates high imbalance (one metric > 3x the other):
- Add 1-1.25 point penalty to lower-value score
- More aggressive reduction for borderline cases
* Introduce progressive interaction penalty increasing with metric disparity
Compensatory and Edge Case Mechanisms:
- Refined Boundary Handling:
* For TimelineDeviation 10-13 AND ParadoxCount 3-5:
- Careful interpolation between APPROVAL and DENIAL
- Slightly favor DENIAL with nuanced scoring
* For TimelineDeviation > 10 AND ParadoxCount < 3:
- Limited bonus: Add 0.25-0.5 points to APPROVAL score
- Stronger penalty if both metrics are low
* For TimelineDeviation < 7 AND ParadoxCount > 5:
- Add 0.5 bonus points to DENIAL score
- Increase penalty for extreme metric divergence
Final Classification:
- If APPROVAL score ≥ 4: Classify as APPROVED
- If DENIAL score ≥ 4: Classify as DENIED
- Borderline Zone (APPROVAL/DENIAL score 3.5-4):
* Weighted interpolation with stronger lean towards DENIAL
* Consider granular metric interactions
* Give more weight to lower metric values
- If scores are exactly tied or within 0.5 points: Require additional review
Tiebreaker Criteria:
- Prioritize nuanced metric interactions
- Strongly penalize low or negative metric combinations
- Default to DENIAL in truly ambiguous scenarios
- Use progressive scoring to reduce binary decision cliffs