Round UUID: b1c0a125-7959-4b0a-a1ba-ec3d4d014e46
Prompt:
Classification Decision Rules: Metric 1: TimelineDeviation Scoring - If TimelineDeviation > 15: Add 3 points to APPROVAL score - If 12 < TimelineDeviation ≤ 15: * Add 2.5 points to APPROVAL score * If ParadoxCount < 3: Reduce bonus by 0.5 points - If 10 < TimelineDeviation ≤ 12: * Add 2 points to APPROVAL score * If ParadoxCount < 4: Carefully interpolate 0.5-1 point reduction - If 8 < TimelineDeviation ≤ 10: * Add 1.5 points to APPROVAL score * If ParadoxCount ≤ 2: - Add 0.5-1 point to DENIAL score - Significantly reduce APPROVAL potential - If 7 < TimelineDeviation ≤ 8: * Add 1 point to APPROVAL score * If ParadoxCount ≤ 1: Add 1-1.5 points to DENIAL score - If 5 ≤ TimelineDeviation < 7: * Interpolate 1-2 points to DENIAL score * If ParadoxCount is very low (≤ 0): Add additional 1-1.5 points to DENIAL score - If TimelineDeviation < 5: Add 2-3 points to DENIAL score Metric 2: ParadoxCount Scoring - If ParadoxCount > 6: Add 3 points to APPROVAL score - If 4 < ParadoxCount ≤ 6: * Add 2.5 points to APPROVAL score * If TimelineDeviation < 10: Reduce bonus by 0.5-1 point - If 3 < ParadoxCount ≤ 4: * Add 2 points to APPROVAL score * Carefully interpolate reduction if TimelineDeviation is low - If 2 < ParadoxCount ≤ 3: Add 1.5 points to APPROVAL score - If 1 < ParadoxCount ≤ 2: Add 1 point to DENIAL score - If 0 < ParadoxCount ≤ 1: * Add 1.5-2 points to DENIAL score * Aggressive penalty if TimelineDeviation is also low - If ParadoxCount ≤ 0: * Add 2-3 points to DENIAL score * Implement absolute value penalty scaling Negative ParadoxCount Special Handling: - If ParadoxCount < 0: * If absolute(ParadoxCount) ≤ 1: Add 2.5-3 points to DENIAL score * If absolute(ParadoxCount) > 1 AND ≤ 2: - Add 3.5 points to DENIAL score - Reduce potential APPROVAL score by 1.5 points * If absolute(ParadoxCount) > 2: - Add 4 points to DENIAL score - Completely nullify potential APPROVAL score Critical Interaction Mechanisms: - Metric Balance Coefficient: * Calculate ratio between TimelineDeviation and ParadoxCount * If ratio indicates high imbalance (one metric > 3x the other): - Add 0.75-1 point penalty to the score with lower value - More aggressive reduction for borderline cases * Introduce progressive interaction penalty that increases with metric disparity Compensatory and Edge Case Mechanisms: - Refined Boundary Handling: * For TimelineDeviation 10-13 AND ParadoxCount 3-5: - Implement careful interpolation between APPROVAL and DENIAL - Slightly favor DENIAL but with more nuanced scoring * For TimelineDeviation > 10 AND ParadoxCount < 3: - Limited bonus: Add 0.25-0.5 points to APPROVAL score - Stronger penalty if both metrics are low * For TimelineDeviation < 7 AND ParadoxCount > 5: - Add 0.5 bonus points to DENIAL score - Increase penalty if metrics show extreme divergence Final Classification: - If APPROVAL score ≥ 4: Classify as APPROVED - If DENIAL score ≥ 4: Classify as DENIED - Borderline Zone (APPROVAL/DENIAL score 3.5-4): * Weighted interpolation with stronger lean towards DENIAL * Consider granular metric interactions * Give more weight to lower metric values - If scores are exactly tied or within 0.5 points: Require additional review Tiebreaker Criteria: - Prioritize nuanced metric interactions - Strongly penalize low or negative metric combinations - Default to DENIAL in truly ambiguous scenarios - Use progressive scoring to reduce binary decision cliffs